On Friday, the Contra Costa County Elections issued an update on voting which showed Steve Barr and Diane Burgis are likely to be headed to the November runoff. The winner in November will replace Supervisor Mary Piepho who announced retirement.
Barr, a Brentwood City Councilman, has 28.75% (10,214) of the vote and a comfortable 2,080 vote lead over Burgis. However, since Election Day, Barr has had the gap close a bit losing .09% of the total vote to other candidates.
Burgis, East Bay Regional Parks District Board Trustee, is sitting on 22.89% (8,134) of the vote and has seen the largest increase (.69%) of votes since Election Day. She has expanding her lead over Oakley Councilman Doug Hardcastle by more than 500 votes to 1,492 total votes.
Antioch Mayor Wade Harper is 4th with 14.77% (5,247) while Antioch City Councilwoman Monica Wilson is at 8.91% (3,166). Odessa LeFrancois has 5.78% (2,054) of the vote
The winner in November will replace Supervisor Mary Piepho who announced retirement. She has served on the Board of Supervisors since 2004.
In total, 35,533 votes have been counted:
- 28.75% (10,214) – Steve Barr
- 22.89% (8,134) – Diane Burgis
- 18.69% (6,642) – Doug Hardcastle
- 14.77% (5,247) – Wade Harper
- 8.91% (3,166) – Monica Wilson
- 5.78% (2,054) – Odessa LeFrancois
Glover, Farias Set for November Showdown
In the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisor District 5 Race, Supervisor Federal Glover and Martinez Councilwoman Anamarie Avila Farias have a commanding lead and are headed to the November runoff.
Glover is currently carrying 34.80% (11,847) of the vote while Farias is sitting on 31.18% (10,614) of the vote. Since election night, Farias has closed the gap by gaining nearly a percentage point.
- 11,847 (34.80%) – Federal Glover
- 10,614 (31.18%) – Anamarie Avila Farias
- 4,995 (14.67%) – Michael Menesini
- 4,608 (13.54%) – Dan Romero
- 1,856 (5.45%) – Conrad Dandridge
According to County Elections, the next results update will be June 17, 2016.
23 comments
Glad to see these two in the runoff. Relieved Harper and Wilson are done.
ECT maybe now you will actually ask the tough questions of these two instead of giving them a pass in the primary with softballs.
1. Why did Barr really change parties? To get elected? The gun answer is horrible.
2. Why does Burgis job hop?
3. Other than not being from Antioch, what has either of these two actually accomplished? NOTHING!
If Barr had not entered the race, Hardcastle could have earned 50% on election night and be our next Supervisor.
Not quite sure I understand your point.
I would argue if Hardcastle didn’t enter… Barr would have got 50%+1 since he is leading the primary since Hardcastle took a distant 3rd in the race. I would also argue had Harper, Wilson and LeFrancois not entered on the Democrat side, Burgis would have won 50%+1. Having 4 democrats in one race is a failure of the Democratic party who nearly let two republicans in on a runoff.
Having 2 Reps and 4 Dems in a race ensures no one ever hits 50%.
As for WIlson & Harper being from Antioch, look closely at their voting totals, their numbers are good enough to be re-elected in their respective seats.
Hardcastle was a mean mess by the end. He and his consultant undid their chances of a win every step of the way. Barr jumped in the race because Hardcastle was doing such a terrible job and Republicans needed a better option. Hardcastle would have never got 50% of the vote, ever…. ever…ever!
Republicans, Democrats, and myself Independent at this point should be a moot point. We need a good family oriented and good morals person to represent us. Enough of the behind the scenes political elite. The citizens of America are fed up with political insiders. It has really shown in the national races.They want leaders that are honest, moral, and not part of political cronyism. I hope whomever wins makes Vasco Road less bumper to bumper and overcome the tree hugging distractors from making the road wider and safer for all.
Sorry Vasco, but Steve is a horrible representative. Most people haven’t heard of the guy an mainly got votes because Hardcastle was so bad, and he had signs everywhere. Obviously Brentwood residents vote for signs because Barr has been nothing more than a rubber stamp on the council and fire district. Never once championing an idea or showing individual promise.
Diane Burgis on the other hand is a true leader and has championed many issues for the region. She knows how to roll up her sleeves and do the hard work. It’s no wonder she has credible endorsements from leaders that recognize true talent and leadership.
We need a leader, not a follower. The Delta is going to be the epicenter of the next big battle and Diane is already in tune with that issue. It’s no wonder Piepho who knows and works with all the candidates choose Diane to endorse and support. That says a lot since no one knows the job better than someone who had been doing it for over a decade.
Steve Barr just isn’t Supervisor material. He could even beat a mayor that can cry (crocodile tears) on command.
Diane is the best candidate for the position, Barr none. If anyone can continue the improvements to Vasco it’s Diane Burgis. She knows how to work regionally and since Vasco is a regional, two county roadway, it’s right up her alley. I’d be surprised if Steve even knows where Vasco goes once outside the Brentwood border.
We need an experienced leader. If you are looking for family values go to church. Contra Costa needs leadership!
Diane has my attention because I am wondering why she is the only candidate that has overspent her campaign by 25% or Ten Thousand Dollars. Who is behind taking up that debt ? Will she do that with our tax dollars ? No Mark you are wrong. You can’t even provide an example of all these so called accomplishments. I agree with Vasco. I see a lot of waste and garbage on that road. The last improvement has waste and flaws by Supervisor Piepho for a lousy mile and a half. We could have had much more bang for our buck. Now to see Diane overspend her campaign like that along with job jumping tells me she is not for the people but rather herself just like Mary Piepho. No thank you.
Hey “old timer” are you senile or just stupid? I’m only mentioning it because you are parroting incorrect information posted by one of the usual suspects here. Diane Burgis did not overspend her campaign, but you know who did? I’ll bet you do, because it was both Barr and Hardcastle who both had to throw thousands of dollars into their own campaigns. That is a BIG political no-no. Campaign donations are equally about dollars and a measure of support. It is a fact that Diane Burgis had more of both than the other candidates. It’s why she is where she is. That would make you wrong “old timer”.
I don’t know about Mark but I know I provided a link to Diane Burgis’ website where many accomplishments and information is accessible. Do you have challenges navigating the Internet “old timer” because the information you seek is right there in a very organized display.
Let’s discuss Vasco shall we? After all you brought it up in a drive by style type of hit piece. You claim you see a lot of garbage and waste on Vasco, but failed to give even one example and then tried to blame Mary Piepho. Once again you would be wrong. Garbage and waste is not the responsibility of a supervisor nor is the overall responsibility. Many agencies have to do with the condition and viability of Vasco, from transportation authorities, to public works. Being accurate with your critism isn’t your strong point here “old timer”. Why don’t you humor us and tell us how we could have “had so much more bang for our buck” and then while you are at it, supply your credentials for doing so. I mean after all “old timer” those who do have a hand in the responsibility for Vasco have to have the credentials and accountability to back up their work. From what I see here you have a screen name and a bad attitude which accounts for nothing, so it’s you that has a lot to prove. That is if you want to be taken seriously and not written off as a clown. Right now you have painted yourself as a clown. The choice is yours.
Last but not least was your overused hit “job jumping”. That worn out attempt at slinging mud is as old as you “old timer”. What is evident is that Barr is the real Job Jumper who just hasn’t met with success. That’s the real story. His record indicates that he jumped from school board to city council then tried to jump to mayor. That didn’t work so now he is desperately trying to jump to county supervisor. The difference between Barr and Burgis is that she has talent, experience and actually rises to the position. In this case she was recruited by many people including those who know the job better than anyone else, the Supervisors themselves? Maybe in your old age you already figured that much out for yourself. If not, thanks for giving me the opportunity to educate you.
Diane for the Win!
The difference between Burgis and Barr is monumental.
Diane Burgis has a huge list of accomplishments and Steve Barr has few if any.
Burgis has been a tireless worker and advocate on Delta and water issues.
After hearing Barr, debate it would be a surprise if he knew where the Delta was.
I cannot think of one thing Barr has done for Brentwood or better, the community of District 3 east county. Besides the “its all about Brentwood” ideology of the Brentwood city council, Barr has proven his is just a follower and not a leader. Even after many opportunities, he just doesn’t show leadership. Years on the fire board with out any meaningful interaction or results.
We need a real leader. That leader is Diane Burgis and she is very well seated to take the election in November. Obviously she is very open minded and works well with everyone.
Join me in voting once again for Diane Burgis this November.
OK, ECR, here’s your chance to convince me to change my intended vote in November.
You keep touting Diane’s “huge list of accomplishments”. Can you name 5 of these accomplishments that have happened during her tenure with either the Oakley City Council or EBRPD? I’d prefer something not related to Marsh Creek. An accomplishment cannot be just voting yes or no on a specific item either.
Thanks.
Phule Me Twice, Don’t you think it’s about time for you to do your own research? The rest of us do.
I can EASILY list 5 of her accomplishments but I am not running for office. Why don’t you spend 5 minutes reviewing her website and see if you can narrow her accomplishments down to just 5. http://www.dianeburgis.com/
Then as an added bonus why don’t you visit Barrs website or review his record and see if you can find one accomplishment. He is nothing but someone who fills out a roster when it comes time to voting. The problem everyone has with Steve is his lack of accomplishments and his hypocrisy. Shall we start with his campaign manager that he failed to pay? Or the contract that he broke? There is MUCH more where that came from and I venture to guess that everyone is going to learn that there is much more to running for a county position that flooding your hometown with signage that says nothing.
Nice attempt though at setting perameters for Diane Burgis’ accomplishments.
You don’t even have to try to phule me once, there isn’t a chance in hell that you would vote for her. So as you read this post and reply, please know that it wasn’t for you, it was for everyone else that is looking to find the best candidate.
That is why Diane is going to mop the floor with barr. He isn’t supervisor material and we all know it.
Diane is not the choice because of several reasons,
First and foremost is Dirty Money. That money donated from sitting supervisors directly to her campain. Red flag people.
Second is overspending. She shows overspending her campaign account by 25 percent. Who is picking up the debt? Fiscal irresponsibility is not a good.
Third is job hoping. Will she sell out for another seat at the state level?
Follow the best for East County representation with
Steve Barr for County Supervisor.
Thank you
@Unome,
I wonder if you used your real name if you would be so arrogant on this site and still spit out your phony rhetoric. I bet Monica Wilson, Wade Harper and Doug Hardcastle all wish they had spent more money. Maybe they would be in the runoff.
Clearly you are a ding dong and have no clue how campaigns work or are run and in the tank for Barr who has dirty agricultural money on his side. Dumbass!!!!!
Rehtoric? I think not. The information was gathered from previous ECT articles. I think ECT has done his research and I am reiterating the facts provided. I hope you are not referring your rhetoric statement to ECT proved information. That would be wrong since you are associates.
Oh, dirty ag money ? That’s original. Grow up.
Unome were you just born stupid? My goodness man you can’t even put together a sensible posing.
Oh, and while I am not Big Dave Johnson, his post makes much more sense than yours. I guess you think you have the market cornered on “dirty money” BDJ’s comment was a lot more original than yours. At least his comment was relevant and tied to real dirty money whereas your constant barking about dirty money makes no sense at all. You just make this shit up as you go along don’t you?
Grow up.
Unome, The very fact that you support Barr is reason enough for most people here to chose Diane Burgis. Not to mention that she beats him in every category of ability to do the job.
Keep trying to peddle your dirty money BS. It’s helping Diane every single time you do it. So much so that I am surprised you have not received a call from Barr asking you to please stop.
One of the supervisors is retiring. You do know what that means, correct? And you know that when politicians retire, they cannot keep campaign donations. I’m sure you have heard of the FPPC and their long list of rules. In those rules it is stated that politicians can transfer money between accounts and to other political campaigns.
It appears you have a problem with the fair political practice commission. The don’t call it dirty and in the real world they encourage the practice. But you appear to make your own rules and it has you in some kind of mental frustration which you expel as ridiculous commentary.
Please keep doing what you are doing. Everyone knows (except you) that your opinion is worthless because it doesn’t make sense. Diane didn’t over spend, and where on earth did you make that up? It’s a campaign and as someone else tried to explain to you, reporting periods are not in perfect alignment with fundraising. I’m told one of Diane Burgis largest fundraisers was held after the last reporting period, so not only does she not have debt, I would expect her to jump to a early lead in money raised as the race moves from a primary to a general election.
This alone shows you have no real experience, except to shoot your mouth off and put a few rounds in your foot.
Let’s talk about fiscal responsibility. You know your guy voted himself a 65 percent raise and then tried to trash talk the board of sups for a 33 percent raise they never got. You really think that went unnoticed? No worries my friend, I’m told its going to come out very, very soon.
The issue is even you, can’t really tell us why we should vote for Barr. His plate is as empty as your comments on these pages.
It is really a reach to compare campaign financing and financial leadership but Ok, let’s go there.
You suggest that Barr is the more fiscally responsible one? Is overspending on a campaign and then running out on the bill fiscally responsible? If you want to talk overspending let’s talk about how Barr overspent and then tried to dine and dash out of paying his bill to his consultant (a small business man) when he ran for mayor. Steve Barr was sued by his previous consultant for not paying for services when they overspent. This time around Barr’s consultant probably wouldn’t LET him spend on anything until the consultant got paid so Barr had to loan his own money in to the campaign.
So let’s talk about “loaning” to one’s campaign. Basically when a candidate “loans” to their campaign they are planning on getting paid back. Meaning: Candidates that loan money to their campaigns are taking on a debt for their campaigns. The only difference is they can choose to not pay themselves back later. In Burgis’s case her consultant was confident in Burgis that she would win and or that if she lost she would pay her consultant back. So in this scenario Burgis has more credibility.
Barr loaned his campaign at least $5000 so he will have to fund raise to pay himself back and he will incur more debt as his campaign goes in to the next phase.
Hardcastle loaned himself over $15,000 so he too “overspent” and is in debt.
Barr, Burgis and Hardcastle all spent around the same amount, they all did it the normal way. None were irresponsible.
Those of you trying to characterize it differently are trying to cut down a candidate rather than promoting your candidate. In debating that is usually a technique one uses when they don’t have a better argument. If you want to compare and contrast candidates do so with more evidence.
Look at your post Johnny, anon, aliases, and minions. You cut down two candidates and say don’t cut down candidates. That’s bright. The fact remains that other candidates may have loaned themselves money, but they did it before spending thus keeping their fiscal ledger open honest, and reconciled. Diane overspent ten grand with no way to show how it was to be reconciled. That is irresponsible in so many ways. This type of spending money you don’t have is not a candidate that I would want handling my tax dollars.
Just saying.
Unome, you are consistently insulting others and now you want to act holier than thou? Why don’t you stop your parinioa and deal with the many people that are trying to help you with the facts? You don’t come off as bright, wearing a tin foil hat.
The fact does remain that it is irresponsible and candidates should never loan themselves money for a campaign. RED FLAG in your own words. That’s not so bright. Look at Hardcastle that ran because he claimed he was doing it for his grand-kids! Looks like little Joey and little Jimmy just lost 15,000 of inheritance!! I’m sure they appreciated Mr. Hardcastle pissing away money on a campaign he could never hope to win. Not bright.
I guess you don’t know it is a requirement for all candidates to make campaign reports (so keeping their fiscal ledger open and honest is nothing new).
It is very interesting that you are trying so hard to suggest that Diane Burgis overspent when her campaign is far from over and the next round of campaign reports have yet to come out. It shows me that you know nothing about campaign finance and the reporting procedure. If that is the limit of fiscal knowledge you posses, then its no wonder Barr is your man. Barr had to loan himself money this time, and didn’t pay his debts last time. That is not who most of us want handling their tax dollars.
Urjustnothatsmart and come across as under educated. I ask, do you have any redeeming qualities or do you just enjoy making yourself look dumb?
There is only one person on here who has several aliases and tries to stuff 10 pounds of BS in a 5 pound bucket. Someone really pushed your button. Four attack responses of BS in such a short time. You would think you ran out of BS. It keeps flowing just like wasting water.
Which is why we are testing the Facebook Comments — it will remove most of the folks playing on screen names & fake emails.
“George”, thanks for reading each and every one.
It makes me smile that you actually believe all the comments are coming from one person. It’s good that you need to make excuses if it makes you feel more relevant. The funny thing about the truth is there is plenty of it to go around. Sorry that upsets you. Next time I’ll pen 5 posts in a row, especially since you just let me know it pushes your buttons. The truth is a real biatch.
East County resident, aliases, Johnny, and minions
You make no sense at all. Five posts under East County resident all on talking down to people and you suggest it’s different folks. You are so full of crap. You sound like a drunk laying on a couch about to pass out. I’m glad your supporting Diane. Don’t forget to tell her to buy more signs (on credit unless she has borrowed another ten plus grand) since you think signs are why Barr won. Voters are much smarter these days. That is why Barr beat Burgis by 20 precent more votes. Oh, try sticking to one alias. We are smarter than that too.
Comments are closed.