On Thursday, the Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee announced that Senate Bill 50 by Senator Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco) will become a “two-year bill,” meaning it will not come up for a vote this year and will be eligible for a vote in January.
SB 50 creates new zoning standards for the construction of housing near job centers and public transportation, while protecting against the displacement of renters and vulnerable communities living in those areas. SB 50 eliminates hyper-low-density zoning near transit and job centers, thus legalizing small to mid-size apartment buildings and affordable housing in these locations so that more people can live near transit and near where they work. It also reduces or eliminates minimum parking requirements for new developments.
The Appropriations Committee did not vote on the bill. SB 50 legalizes more housing near public transportation and job centers. It received bipartisan 9-1 and 6-1 votes in its two committee hearings, has 17 bipartisan co-authors from all over California, and is backed by a massive coalition of labor, environmental, affordable housing, business, senior, and student organizations.
Senator Wiener issued the following statement:
“While I am deeply disappointed the Chair of the Appropriations Committee has decided to postpone SB 50 until 2020 – since we have a housing crisis right now, – we are one hundred percent committed to moving the legislation forward. California faces a 3.5 million home shortage – equal to the combined housing shortage of the other 49 states – and status quo isn’t working. California failed housing policy is pushing people into homelessness, poverty, and two-hour commutes, is pushing working families out of their communities and out of the state entirely, and is undermining California climate goals. We need to do things differently when it comes to housing. We’re either serious about solving this crisis, or we aren’t. At some point, we will need to make the hard political choices necessary for California to have a bright housing future.”
In a statement, California Senate Chair on Appropriations, Senator Anthony J. Portantino’s (D–La Cañada Flintridge) statement on the decision in the Senate Appropriations Committee regarding SB 50:
“SB 50 is a well-intentioned effort to help solve our state’s housing crisis and it highlights two valid ways to affect land use decisions across the state: providing incentives or legislating mandates. My preference has always fallen on the side of incentives for local governments to accomplish goals. There were legitimate concerns expressed from both large and small cities about the scope of SB 50 as it pertained to bus corridors, historic preservation, the definition of ‘jobs rich’ neighborhoods and whether it would increase gentrification and discourage light rail expansion as unintended consequences; all of which justified the pause established today by the committee. My colleague from San Francisco is one of the smartest and most earnest legislators in the capitol. He cares deeply about the housing crisis and I expect him to continue to pursue his goals. Hopefully we provided the opportunity to broaden the conversation, which can result in a more targeted legislative effort.”
For more on SB 50: click here.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST
Existing
By adding to the duties of local planning officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
2 comments
The idiot Wiener pulled SB50 because he knew he would have a real fight on his hands. We don’t have a housing crisis at all. We have a “people who cannot afford to live here” crisis. There are states where they can live very nicely on what they earn.
I agree! Wiener, the jerk, wants to take away residents’ rights to have input in what goes into their established neighborhoods. He wants this silly-assed law to supercede their wishes. It won’t work because people don’t want their established neighborhoods to be overrun by “affordable” housing which brings in the riff-raff. Look at what happened to Antioch!
Comments are closed.