Home California Asm. Wicks Introduces Bill to Mandate Vaccinations in California Workplaces

Asm. Wicks Introduces Bill to Mandate Vaccinations in California Workplaces

Press Release

by ECT

OAKLAND — Assemblymember Buffy Wicks announced a first-in-the-nation bill that would mandate all businesses in the state of California to require their employees and independent contractors to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

Assembly Bill 1993 would require workplaces and employers of all sizes to verify that their workers – both employees and independent contractors – are fully immunized against the COVID-19 virus. If signed into law and passed by Governor Newsom, the law would take effect on January 1, 2023.

The bill comes in the wake of a U.S. Supreme Court decision blocking President Biden’s nationwide vaccine mandate for large employers, leaving vaccine rules and implementation up to individual states. With responsibilities falling on individual state legislatures, Asm. Wicks aims to carry these critical workplace safety requirements into law on the State level.

“The pathway to endemic is through vaccines – and to get there, Californians need consistency and certainty,” said Assemblymember Buffy Wicks (D-Oakland). “People have experienced so much whiplash over the past couple years when it comes to ever-changing guidelines in the workplace. Workers are craving stability, and vaccines are the key to making that happen.”

AB 1993 would require new hires of a business to have at least one shot by their first day on the job, and the second within 45 days. The bill includes no option for a testing alternative unless an employee qualifies for a medical or religious exemption.

Guidance for employers on what constitutes a medical condition, disability, religious belief, and valid vaccination status would be determined by the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (CalOSHA) and the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). If signed into law, businesses that don’t comply with the bill would be subject to fines and penalties

Included below are a series of quotes from lawmakers, business, labor, and public health stakeholders:

“California’s employees deserve to be safe in their workplaces, and California businesses small and big alike need consistency and certainty to remain open and prospering with the endemic,” said Sen. Dr. Richard Pan (D-Sacramento). “We know COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective at preventing most from experiencing serious illness, hospitalization and death, and that vaccines help reduce the spread of the virus in our communities thereby protecting the most vulnerable. That’s why I am co-authoring this important legislation with Assemblymember Wicks and others, because the vaccines work, and vaccine mandates work to increase vaccination rates and keep our communities safer.”

“The U.S. accounts for 4% of the world’s population, 21% of the world’s COVID cases, and 15% of the world’s COVID deaths. Our country has not done a good job of keeping people safe and protected for the preventable impacts of this illness, and we have an opportunity to do better in California by mandating vaccines in our workplaces,” said John Swartzberg, Infectious Disease Expert at the UC Berkeley School of Public Health. “When people are vaccinated, the world is safer — businesses are more stable, their employees and patrons better protected. It’s time we take what we know — that vaccines and mandates work — and allow it to help our businesses prosper.”

“Our essential workers have been the linchpin of our communities during COVID, showing up every day to make sure people have what they need while being disproportionately impacted themselves,” said Jim Araby, Director of Strategic Campaigns, UFCW Local 5. “Now, AB 1933 will give California workers what they’ve deserved since Day One of this pandemic: the ability to feel safe, to feel valued, and to feel protected in their workplace.”

“Coronavirus variants continue to disrupt business operations and create financial uncertainty for small businesses in California and throughout the country,” said John Arensmeyer, Founder and CEO of Small Business Majority. “Small business owners don’t want to be traffic cops in debates about public safety; they are looking for a common statewide standard that disentangles them from politics and enables them to operate their businesses safely and predictably. We must enact bold policies that will give California small businesses the certainty they need to operate at capacity and help them get back to normal.”

“Business Improvement Districts are committed to making commercial neighborhoods—which are part of our civic lifeblood– welcoming, active places where all are welcome and feel safe to shop, dine, and come to their jobs. Our resilient small businesses feel responsibility and stewardship for the safety of customers and employees, and they have been through a trying period of whiplash and uncertainty,” said Savlan Hauser, Executive Director of Jack London Improvement District. “This legislation will help relieve the rule-making burden on any individual businesses as they welcome customers and workers, and ensure safe work environments and places for all.”

“Employees deserve safe workplaces, and we know vaccines are key to keeping us safe as individuals and as a community,” said Crystal Strait, Board Chair of ProtectUS. “Despite the partisan rhetoric and vitriol, Asm. Wicks is stepping above the fray to make sure we make progress in moving safely to an endemic state. On behalf of the pro-vaxx majority in the US, we wholeheartedly support this effort to make workplaces safe.”

# # #

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST

AB 1993, as introduced, Wicks. Employment: COVID-19 vaccination requirements.
Existing law, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), establishes the Department of Fair Employment and Housing within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency and sets forth its powers and duties relating to the enforcement of civil rights laws with respect to housing and employment.
Existing federal law, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, authorizes the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services to approve new drugs and products, including vaccines, for introduction into interstate commerce, and authorizes the secretary to authorize vaccines for use in an emergency upon declaring a public health emergency. On February 4, 2020, the secretary determined that there is a public health emergency and declared circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of drugs and biological products. The secretary subsequently authorized the emergency use of 3 vaccines for the prevention of COVID-19, and on August 23, 2021, the secretary approved a vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19.
The California Emergency Services Act authorizes the Governor to declare a state of emergency during conditions of disaster or extreme peril to persons or property, including epidemics. On March 4, 2020, the Governor declared a state of emergency relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. Pursuant to this authority, the Governor issued several executive orders requiring individuals in specified employment, health care, school, or other settings to provide proof of a COVID-19 vaccination status, unless specified exceptions are met.
This bill would require an employer to require each person who is an employee or independent contractor, and who is eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine, to show proof to the employer, or an authorized agent thereof, that the person has been vaccinated against COVID-19. This bill would establish an exception from this vaccination requirement for a person who is ineligible to receive a COVID-19 vaccine due to a medical condition or disability or because of a sincerely held religious belief, as specified, and would require compliance with various other state and federal laws. The bill would require proof-of-vaccination status to be obtained in a manner that complies with federal and state privacy laws and not be retained by the employer, unless the person authorizes the employer to retain proof.
This bill would require, on January 1, 2023, each employer to affirm, in a form and manner provided by the department, that each employee or independent contractor complied with these provisions, and would require the employer to affirm that each new employee or independent contractor is in compliance at the time of hiring or contracting with that person. The bill would require the department to impose a penalty of an unspecified amount on an employer for any violation of these provisions.
This bill would repeal these provisions when the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices determines that COVID-19 vaccinations are no longer necessary for the health and safety of individuals.
This bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
This bill would declare that its provisions are severable.
Originally Posted February 11, 2022

You may also like

13 comments

W Wilson Feb 12, 2022 - 11:38 am

That would mean that ninety proof nancy’s staff in sf would have to be jabbed, usps workers jabbed . How’s that going to work out?

Harry Palms Feb 12, 2022 - 6:10 pm

She sucks

anon Feb 12, 2022 - 6:52 pm

this is so stupid !!!! the whole reason why the mandate didnt work is because it is unconstitutional !!!!!!!!! how did this stupid lady get to even try to pass this horrible bs ?

anon Feb 12, 2022 - 6:55 pm

this bill goes completely against what the CDC guidelines . what is the point to have freedoms from the federal government if the state will make a stupid law to take it away ?

Robert C. Feb 14, 2022 - 8:13 am

Since the federal mandate ran into judicial roadblocks, I wonder how Ms. Wicks thinks her state mandate would fare better.

Troy McClure Feb 14, 2022 - 7:04 pm

Awesome. Let’s shut down every business in California. Let’s close every school due to a lack of students. California is going to drastically change for the worse very soon. Now they want to remove religious exemptions? Let 12 year olds get shots without their parents consent? Madness. I cannot get out of California fast enough.

Clarke Acton Feb 14, 2022 - 9:22 pm

I assume Wicks is a socialist/anarchist who does not care if small business is impacted. I don’t think she would show any remorse for the common business owner. My wife and I have been in business for 10 years in the east bay with over 200 clients. We would shut down come 2023. We would lose at least 15% of our clients. Attorneys CPAs – they will early retire. We are unprofitable down 15% and will close shop

s Feb 17, 2022 - 7:20 pm

An anarchist – a real one – would not force a medical procedure on other people, let alone one that has alarming (and inadequate) safety data, does not work and has no scientific justification. Anarchists don’t believe in tyrannizing other people and taking away their most sacred rights – like that of control over their own bodies.

As a left-leaning person, but one who believes you should never force things into other peoples’ bodies that they do not want, especially ones as dubious and outright suspicious as these, this would probably have me leave Calif. too. These nutcases are not right in the head. Covid is really bringing out the latent crazy & authoritarianism in many people.

Tony B. Feb 17, 2022 - 12:48 pm

This is another liberal, reprehensible overreach of power!! Infuriating. The govt. cannot tell me what to put in my body and threaten my nearly 20 years at my company when those who get the jab are just as communicable in spreading it. Sacramento is completely out of touch with the rest of the WORLD!

s Feb 17, 2022 - 7:23 pm

There is no scientific (or moral) justification for this. Are Calif. lawmakers so incompetent that they don’t realize this, or are they knowingly complicit in fraud, medical malpractice and crimes against humanity?

s Feb 17, 2022 - 7:28 pm

An anarchist – a real one – would not force things into other peoples’ bodies that they do not want. Tyranny, force and authoritarianism are the opposite of anarchy, which means there is no ruler.

As a left-leaning person, this would have me leave Calif. too. There is no scientific or ethical justification for this, and they have to know that. Or are they really just this mentally deficient? Either way shows they have no capacity to lead.

s Feb 17, 2022 - 7:29 pm

There is no scientific, or ethical, justification for this. These products carry risks, including risk of severe harm or death. And they clearly do not stop the virus from spreading. Is Asm. Wicks aware of these facts? If so, why is she ignoring them?

Anon Feb 18, 2022 - 1:54 pm

this lady is clearly being paid out to push this bs bill !!!

Comments are closed.