Home California Statewide Initiative to Restore a Neighborhood Voice by Reversing Sacramento Housing Laws Begins to Gather Voter Signatures

Statewide Initiative to Restore a Neighborhood Voice by Reversing Sacramento Housing Laws Begins to Gather Voter Signatures

by ECT

Community leaders fighting back against “blank check to developers” that allow multiunit and multi-story projects next to single-family homes without neighborhood input

California – In the past several years, Sacramento politicians have passed numerous laws that take away the ability of local communities to make thoughtful planning decisions. These laws are denying Californians the right to speak out in a meaningful way when developers are damaging and gentrifying their neighborhoods.

These new laws allow developers to build multi-unit and multi-story buildings next door to single-family homes without local approval, without community input, and without any new contributions to fund transit, schools, parks, roads, safety or other services. The new state laws allow developers to build without any units being reserved for affordable housing and with zero contributions to affordable housing programs.

The “Our Neighborhood Voices Initiative” will restore local input and the ability of residents to speak out about what is happening next door to their homes and apartments.

The growing coalition of local leaders and neighborhood groups dedicated to preserving a neighborhood voice in city planning began to collect signatures to qualify a statewide ballot measure that restores California residents’ voice in community decisions — versus new state laws that give for-profit developers a blank check to build in single-family neighborhoods without community input or any contributions to fund local services or affordable housing.

The measure will protect a community’s ability to shape local growth, preserve the character of neighborhoods, and require developers to contribute to the costs associated with new housing.

The Our Neighborhood Voices Initiative seeks to qualify for the November 2022 ballot.

The five proponents of the initiative include three locally elected officials as well as affordable housing advocates. They cut across party lines, represent different races, gender and economic class. The proponents point out the new housing laws recently passed in Sacramento require taxpayers to fund the costs of new developments, not developers, increasing the tax burden on California families.

Proponent and original author of the initiative, Bill Brand, Mayor of Redondo Beach, said, “The one-size-fits-all approach coming from Sacramento will be disastrous for our State. Not only does it ignore the specific needs, challenges and diversity of the 58 counties and 482 cities in California, it ends single-family zoning in the entire state in one fell swoop. We must do what’s best for California, not what’s most profitable for developers.”

Proponent John Heath, founding President of the United Homeowners’ Association, said, “turning local planning decisions over to developers means massive displacement and gentrification. It does not mean new affordable housing. Our communities deserve to be heard – and that’s why we are uniting to preserve our community voices.”

Proponent Jovita Mendoza, of the Brentwood City Council, said, “we all care about affordable housing and housing choice. We also care about our infrastructure. We need to make smart decisions for every city, and you can’t do that from an ivory tower.”

The Our Neighborhood Voices Initiative can be found at OurNeighborhoodVoices.com.

Facebook: www.facebook.com/OurVoicesCA


Title & Summary:  PROVIDES THAT LOCAL LAND-USE AND ZONING LAWS OVERRIDE

You may also like

1 comment

Robert C. Nov 3, 2021 - 7:21 am

it is not surprising to see a ballot initiative such as this appear. It’s a predictable reaction to the left wing of the Democratic supermajority in the state legislature (led by Scott Wiener et. al.) and its legislative overreach. Whether its a good solution is debatable. I’d prefer to “throw the bastards out” and elect many more moderates of both parties, if we can find any. The problem is that our screwed-up primary process makes it almost impossible for responsible moderates to be nominated – their voices are drowned out by the wack jobs of the left AND the right.

Comments are closed.