Using Pot While Driving Would Be Outlawed By Bill Introduced By Senator Jerry Hill and Assemblymember Evan Low With Support From Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen
Legislation Closes Loophole in Prop. 64, Authorizes Penalties for Using Marijuana Products While Behind the Wheel
SACRAMENTO – State Senator Jerry Hill and Assemblymember Evan Low introduced Senate Bill 65 to outlaw smoking marijuana while driving. The legislation, prompted by Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen, closes a loophole in Proposition 64, the recreational marijuana initiative, which makes it illegal to have an open container of pot in a vehicle but fails to specifically address the use of marijuana products while behind the wheel.
“This legislation makes our laws for smoking while driving consistent with drinking while driving,” said Senator Hill, D-San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties. “With New Year’s Eve approaching, it’s important to remind Californians that impaired driving can be deadly.”
“We see all-too-often the terrible toll impaired driving takes on our citizens. This law underscores that driving is a serious responsibility that should be undertaken without impairment,” said Assemblymember Low, D-Silicon Valley.
“There is no difference between a joint and a can of beer to the family of a victim of impaired driving,” Santa Clara County District Attorney Jeff Rosen said. “Senator Hill and Assemblyman Low have proposed a law that is a smart and reasonable approach to the problem of driving while high. Let’s all get home safely.”
Under current law, California motorists can be arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, marijuana or other drugs, if they are unable to drive with the caution and care of a sober person. A basic offense is usually charged as a misdemeanor. There’s no standard for marijuana impairment like the .08 blood alcohol content threshold used for drunk driving because technology for a roadside test of marijuana use is still being developed. But a law enforcement officer or a trained drug recognition expert working with police may deem a motorist marijuana impaired.
With the passage of Prop 64., motorists may be cited for an infraction for having an open container or package of marijuana in a vehicle as a result of provisions in the initiative that attempted to make laws on marijuana use and possession while driving consistent with laws on use and possession of alcohol while driving.
Unfortunately, nothing in Prop. 64 or pre-existing law expressly prohibits smoking or ingesting marijuana while driving – leaving law enforcement officers with limited options if a driver is spotted smoking or ingesting marijuana products.
The new legislation would make it an infraction for anyone to smoke or consume marijuana in any form while driving a vehicle or piloting a vessel or aircraft, consistent with the law on drinking while operating a car, boat or plane. The bill also provides judges with the option to penalize the offense as an infraction or a misdemeanor.
“Impaired driving endangers us all and this bill will give law enforcement and judges more tools to crack down on smoking pot or drinking while driving,” said Senator Hill.
Senator Hill has authored several reforms in recent years to make roadways safer including license revocation for repeat DUI offenders (AB 1601 (Chapter 301, Statutes of 2010)) and preventing underage drinking on party buses (AB 45 (Chapter 461, Statutes of 2012)). This year his SB 1046 was signed continuing the ignition interlock device requirement for all DUI offenders in Sacramento, Los Angeles, Alameda and Tulare counties and expanding the requirement statewide starting in 2019.
6 comments
California has become one of the most screwed up states in the union. Trampling on our 2nd amendment RIGHTS while letting dopers run amuck. California needs to pull its head out of its @ss before it’s too late.
So what’s the alternative, SMH? Make sure everyone is armed to the teeth while rounding up all “dopers” into holding cells?
That would be a start. California is moving farther and farther to the left and soon it will find itself frozen out by the Feds. It’s time to turn the ship around before the moral fabric of the Great State deteriorates any further. People are just plain fed up as our national election just demonstrated. Believing that we are an island is a big mistake.
-Me
Drug abuse is a MEDICAL issue not a criminal one. It’s unfortunate that law enforcement doesn’t want a safer society, they want more people behind bars. The political spectrum is circular not linear, so the more “right” you want to be, you’re actually gravitating towards the “left”.
If you’re doing drugs that are against the law (doesn’t include marijuana anymore) it IS a criminal issue. Cancer, diabetes and heart disease are medical issues. There’s a BIG difference.
I too am against any form of impaired driving (caffeine, nicotine, prescription, etc), but it sounds pretty hypocritical to allow a “legal limit” of alcohol consumption, for example, while pushing a new law like this. It’s been established for a long time now that alcohol is by far the largest contributor to driving accident/fatalities on a daily basis, yet we allow folks to still have some amount in their systems before they drive. How is this consistent?
If lawmakers really cared about your safety on the road, they’d implement a ZERO tolerance measure for alcohol. A new law to combat smoking while driving (when we already have impairment laws) is simply a last resort measure to hold on to the outdated prohibition-era nostalgia lost to legalization.
Comments are closed.