SACRAMENTO — Lawmakers approved a comprehensive wildfire safety plan that will prevent future infernos like those that have been ravaging the state while protecting utility ratepayers from bearing unfair costs.
Senate Bill 901 was approved on votes of 29 to 4 in the Senate and 45 to 10 in the Assembly. It heads next to Gov. Jerry Brown for his signature.
“From the start of this year, my highest priority was and remains responding to past wildfires and preventing future tragedies,” said Sen. Bill Dodd, D-Napa, chairman of the bipartisan conference committee that drafted the bill. “My goals were simple – to stand up for constituents and ensure they recovered all they are entitled to for the damage they suffered, protect Californians from new wildfires and destruction, hold electric utilities accountable and protect the long-term interests of ratepayers. I believe this bill achieves those aims.”
SB 901 attacks the wildfire problem on multiple levels including requiring better forest management practices, increased fuel reduction efforts, the de-energizing of electric utility power lines in extreme weather and a general hardening of the utility grid. It also protects ratepayers against bearing unfair costs, in part by authorizing the use of ratepayer protection bonds for utilities.
Without the debt stabilization mechanism for utilities, the corporations could face higher borrowing costs or even bankruptcy, which will translate into significantly higher rates, Senator Dodd said.
“Make no mistake – Senate Bill 901 is necessary,” Senator Dodd said. “Without it, ratepayers will be left holding the bag and communities will needlessly suffer.”
According to the Bill:
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL’S DIGEST
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, while local publicly owned electric utilities and electrical cooperatives are under the direction of their governing boards. Existing law requires each electrical corporation, local publicly owned electric utility, and electrical cooperative to construct, maintain, and operate its electrical lines and equipment in a manner that will minimize the risk of catastrophic wildfire posed by those electrical lines and equipment. Existing law requires each electrical corporation to annually prepare a wildfire mitigation plan and to submit its plan to the commission for review, as specified. Existing law requires the commission to review and comment on the submitted plan, as specified. Existing law requires the governing board of a local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative to determine whether any portion of the geographical area where the utility’s overhead electrical lines and equipment are located has a significant risk of catastrophic wildfire resulting from those electrical lines and equipment and, if so, requires the utility, at an interval determined by its board, to present to its board for approval those wildfire mitigation measures the utility intends to undertake to minimize the risk of its overhead electrical lines and equipment causing a catastrophic wildfire.
This bill would require a wildfire mitigation plan prepared by an electrical corporation, and wildfire mitigation measures prepared by a local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative, to include a description of the factors the preparing entity uses to determine when it may be necessary to deenergize its electrical lines and deactivate its reclosers, including meteorological and fire threat conditions, and an assessment of risks to the health and welfare of customers who may lose power. The bill would also require a wildfire mitigation plan and wildfire mitigation measures to include appropriate and feasible procedures for notifying customers, including, as a priority, critical first responders, health care facilities, and operators of telecommunications infrastructure, who may be impacted by the deenergizing of electrical lines.
Under existing law, a violation of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime.
Because a violation of these provisions by an electrical corporation would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Additionally, by placing additional duties upon local publicly owned electric utilities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
A link to the Conference Committee website is here: http://focus.senate.ca.gov/wildfirecommittee.
Votes:
08/31/18 | (PASS) | Assembly Floor | 49 | 14 | 17 | SB 901 Dodd Conference Report By HOLDEN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ayes: Aguiar-Curry, Travis Allen, Berman, Bigelow, Brough, Burke, Calderon, Carrillo, Chau, Chen, Chiu, Choi, Chu, Cooley, Cooper, Dahle, Daly, Eggman, Flora, Frazier, Friedman, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez Fletcher, Harper, Holden, Irwin, Jones-Sawyer, Low, Mayes, Medina, Muratsuchi, Nazarian, O’Donnell, Quirk, Reyes, Rivas, Rodriguez, Rubio, Santiago, Mark Stone, Thurmond, Ting, Voepel, Waldron, Weber, Wood, Rendon | ||||||
Noes: Arambula, Baker, Caballero, Gray, Lackey, Levine, Maienschein, McCarty, Melendez, Mullin, Obernolte, Quirk-Silva, Salas, Steinorth | ||||||
No Votes Recorded: Acosta, Bloom, Bonta, Cervantes, Chávez, Cunningham, Fong, Gabriel, Gallagher, Cristina Garcia, Grayson, Kalra, Kamlager-Dove, Kiley, Limón, Mathis, Patterson |
08/31/18 | (PASS) | Senate Floor | 29 | 4 | 7 | Conference Report SB901 Dodd et al. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ayes: Allen, Anderson, Atkins, Beall, Bradford, Cannella, De León, Delgado, Dodd, Galgiani, Glazer, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leyva, McGuire, Mitchell, Monning, Moorlach, Nielsen, Pan, Portantino, Roth, Skinner, Stern, Wieckowski, Wiener | ||||||
Noes: Gaines, Hill, Vidak, Wilk | ||||||
No Votes Recorded: Bates, Berryhill, Chang, Fuller, Morrell, Nguyen, Stone |
1 comment
I like the “defensible space” responsibility as this puts the cause of a fire spreading on the property owners and not back on me the ratepayer, if the utility is found to be the cause of the fire. Unfortunately, I do not believe this bill properly addresses this major cause of fire spreading.
Comments are closed.