Home California California Plastic Bag Ban Put on Hold, Voters to Decide in 2016

California Plastic Bag Ban Put on Hold, Voters to Decide in 2016

by ECT

California voters will now have a say on whether a statewide ban on plastic shopping bags will stand after enough signatures were collected to place the issue on the 2016 ballot.

More than 800,000 signatures were submitted by the December 29, 2014 deadline in order to qualify the referendum. The county registrars performed a signature check where at least 555,236 valid signatures were needed to qualify by random sampling and today that threshold was exceeded. 504,706 signatures were needed for the referendum to qualify.

Under SB 270:

  • Prohibit, beginning July 1, 2015, grocery stores and pharmacies from making available single-use plastic bags. If paper bags are offered to customers, they would have to include recycled content.
  • Prohibit, beginning July 1, 2016, convenience stores and liquor stores from making available single-use plastic bags.
  • Grandfather in existing local ordinances.
  • Provide up to $2 million in competitive loans to businesses transitioning to the manufacture of reusable bags.

Here is a press release from the American Progressive Bag Alliance

American Progressive Bag Alliance Announces Growing Coalition of Support to Overturn SB 270

After a signature check conducted by California county registrars, Secretary of State Alex Padilla today announced the qualification of a ballot measure to repeal Senate Bill 270, legislation passed in 2014 to ban plastic retail bags and allow grocers to charge – and keep – 10 cents for each paper and thicker plastic bag provided to their customers. With the qualification, the law will be suspended until California voters cast their ballots on the issue in November 2016.

“SB 270 was never a bill about the environment. It was a backroom deal between the California Grocers Association and their union friends to scam consumers out of billions of dollars in bag fees – all under the guise of environmentalism,” said Lee Califf, Executive Director of the American Progressive Bag Alliance. “California voters will now have the chance to vote down a terrible law that, if implemented, would kill 2,000 local manufacturing jobs and funnel obscene profits to big grocers without any money going to a public purpose or environmental initiative.”

More than 800,000 signatures were submitted by the December 29, 2014 deadline in order to qualify the referendum. The county registrars performed a signature check where at least 555,236 valid signatures were needed to qualify by random sampling and today that threshold was exceeded. 504,706 signatures were needed for the referendum to qualify.

“SB 270 is a de facto multi-million dollar tax on California’s small businesses and shoppers. Voters should be thrilled to have the opportunity to reverse it,” said John Kabateck, California Executive Director of the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB).

In addition to suspending the law until after votes are cast in November 2016, qualifying the referendum will also save hundreds of thousands in taxpayer dollars that would otherwise be wasted on state administrative costs associated with implementation of the bill. According to the Legislative Analyst’s Office over $700,000 would need to be allocated from the state budget to fund administrative positions from 2015-2018.

”State lawmakers continue to saddle Californians with more taxes, fees and wasteful red tape. We are certain that, now given the opportunity, California voters will trash the foolish bag tax,” said Jon Coupal, President of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (HJTA).

In addition to NFIB and HJTA, a coalition of business and taxpayer groups has formed in support of the measure, including:

  • Alliance of Contra Costa Taxpayers
  • American Forest & Paper Association
  • Calaveras County Taxpayers Association
  • California Taxpayer Protection Committee
  • Contra Costa Taxpayers Association
  • Fullerton Association of Concerned Taxpayers
  • Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
  • Humboldt County Taxpayers League
  • Inland Empire Taxpayers Association
  • International Faith Based Coalition
  • National Federation of Independent Business
  • Orange County Taxpayers Association
  • Placer County Taxpayers Association
  • Retailers and Store Owners United to Rebuild California’s Economy
  • Sacramento Taxpayers Association
  • San Diego Tax Fighters
  • San Joaquin County Taxpayers Association, Inc.
  • So Cal Tax Revolt Coalition Inc.
  • Solano County Taxpayers Association
  • Sutter County Taxpayers Association
  • Ventura County Taxpayers Association

Added Califf, “Today is an important day for tens of thousands of families across the country that are supported by the American plastic bag manufacturing and recycling industry. It’s outrageous that California legislators voted to kill California jobs just to line the pockets of big grocers and their labor union supporters. But the APBA is proud to defend these workers and we remain confident California voters will reject the bag ban scam at the ballot box in November 2016.”

About the American Progressive Bag Alliance (APBA)

The American Progressive Bag Alliance was founded in 2005 to represent the United States’ plastic bag manufacturing and recycling sector, employing 30,800 workers in 349 communities across the nation. APBA promotes the responsible use, reuse, recycling and disposal of plastic bags and advocates for American-made plastic products as the best environmental choice at check out—for both retailers and consumers.

You may also like

1 comment

Victor Namuche Feb 25, 2015 - 4:31 pm

I wish it would been up for a vote in 2015 instead of 2016. I went to Rite Aid in Pleasant Hill this past Saturday to purchase some items in a buy 1, get 1 free type deal but had no plastic bag to store these items. Yet, the Rite Aid in Antioch gives out plastic bags presumably until July 1st.

It is such a ridiculous law made by some liberal hipster hoping to make a name of herself. Either way, I am going to vote to overturn this law when it does come up on Election Day.

Comments are closed.