Home Opinion Editorial: Five Things in East County That I Would Like to See Happen in 2016

Editorial: Five Things in East County That I Would Like to See Happen in 2016

by ECT

With another year come and gone, East Contra Costa has seen many high points and many low points. But with 2016 less than 24-hours away, after the champagne glasses are raised, a new chapter begins and a chance at a fresh start.

2016 will be a vital year in East Contra Costa County and it appears the public is paying more attention than ever to what is transpiring locally—in fact, I would argue that the public’s “BS” radar is higher than its ever been when it comes to information being provided by local governments and even news media.

Here are five things I personally want to see happen in 2016. Some of them likely will never happen, but others are really needed and would be a benefit to the public.

5. Self-Awareness of Social Media Chatter
social-mediaSocial media has become the “go to” source for information gathering and conversations. Yet, it continues to be a place for folks to bully and be brave in what they say without consequence—I refer to them as keyboard commandos.

I would like to see people think about what they say prior to posting and be self-aware of what they are posting and determine if it’s appropriate, an immediate reaction they may not mean, or if it’s just ignorant. Selfishly and admittingly this would equate to a lot less moderating of our Facebook page which equals more time for added content.

Words can have consequences or they can have actions; it’s a tough lesson to learn. But here is the tip, on any social media platform, we know who you are. It’s not like you are under an alias. We see your photograph, we see your profile. The question I have is would you make that same comment to someone’s face. Would you say it in front of your grandparent?

In 2016, I’d like to see more discussion and less personal attacks on social media across the board. It starts with self-awareness.

4. City of Antioch Hire a Public Information Officer (PIO)
It’s not that the City of Antioch does not provide information upon request, they do and do it quickly. But the fact one has to request clarifications after they already put it out is a problem. Let’s face it, the communication from the City of Antioch is poorly executed in its messaging. A public information officer would be of great benefit to not only the City of Antioch, but its residents who could get better packaged information that would now be useful to them.

AntiochLogoWith a PIO, complex issues could be better explained by someone who could meet with key staff, gather the information, and formulate and package the information so that is easy to understand—such as budgets, ordinances, announcements, and citywide campaigns.

This position would help Antioch better communicate in different mediums such as print, social media, and interacting with the media. This position would not be about pushing an agenda, it’s about finding the basic ability and facts to better communicate what city staff is actually doing for the public. Currently, Antioch is failing to inform and thus begins the spread of bad information, duplicated work load by explaining things over and over again, while fighting a mistrust of the public–its a recipe for chaos and is currently being played out.

Given the perceived regression by the City of Antioch, a public information officer may be just what Antioch needs to rebuild the relationship it seems to be losing with the public.

3. City of Oakley Hire a New City Manager, Hit Reset
I would prefer to prop people up to start 2016 versus tearing them down so as simple as I can make it, the Oakley City Council needs to seek out a new city manager as quick as possible.

Bryan MontgomeryOakley has been regressing and making some very poor choices over the last several years—no greater error than Main Street in downtown Oakley, the loss of a power plant and that revenue, treating Oakley veterans as second class citizens to playing favorites with certain non-profits over everyone else, Mr. Montgomery has his hands in all of it.

Now Oakley is in talks over a commuter rail station which would further clog the downtown area and add more homes –its a disaster waiting to happen.

Firing Montgomery in 2016 is unlikely as Oakley’s Council is rather weak and vote as they are guided to via Montgomery. I can think of no greater error than terminating the contract with the Sheriff’s Department. The City was warned multiple times and it was rammed through.

This is not any knock on the police officers at all, in fact, they will be able to provide better service and operations will be much improved, but strictly from a budget standpoint it was never properly vetted in the public and the numbers never seriously discussed. Oakley does have a Year-1 savings which is true, however, I believe within 5 years that Oakley will seek a citywide tax to fund its new police department all in the name of 2 or 3 officers. Oakley will find out there will be added costs which the City and council failed to take into consideration.  That oh-uh moment is at least 3-years out and its going to be a rather expensive oversight.

Montgomery was useful as the city was new and growing, but his ideas are tired, counterproductive and our economic development is non-existent. Meanwhile, residents and businesses grow more frustrated by the day with the city.

All one has to do is look at both Antioch and Brentwood. Both have benefited from new hires. Oakley would benefit from fresh ideas and a new atmosphere at City Hall.

If the current council will not make this decision, three seats are up in November which would give the necessary voters required to move the city into a new direction.

2. Antioch Provide Main Channel Scanner Access
This is an argument where both sides (Police & Public) are right and are wrong at the same time. Officer safety with a scanner is important along with crime in-progress calls, but so is safety of the public by being aware of what may be transpiring nearby.

My goal for 2016 is to find a common ground with the Antioch Police Department to ensure their main channel traffic is accessible to the public—on a delay.

IMG_1812Currently, unless the police department provides a press release, a brief in the city managers weekly report, or wait to view data a week later in the arrest log. In the meantime, in real-time when it may be needed most, the public is in the dark. Police have not taken to twitter or Facebook to alert folks to avoid an area nor have they used their brand new app.

Admittingly, since the scanner was turned off, EastCountyToday traffic has gone up, but more important than our traffic figures is transparency and the more informed people in Antioch are, the better.

I personally have suggested to the police chief several times a work around which includes main channel be open with tactical channels being encrypted. It was rejected. I then suggested the scanner be provided online at a delay tied to police response time—a 10-minut delay. Also rejected. A daily recap or copy of a Watch Commanders report, also rejected.

The problem with the scanner blackout to the public is that the police department determines what is important to the public versus the public deciding what they feel is important… thus a common ground is needed.

IMG_1752With the scanner now off for two months, its still too early in the data to determine if its assisting with reducing crime, my guess is it is, but is it coming at the cost of public trust and unwinding everything the police department worked so hard to achieve in rebuilding public trust prior to its two measures being passed? The answer is yes.

One telling statement coming from conversations with officers in the street is they want the public to know how hard they are working for them. As someone who used to show the public how hard they were working given the anti-police mentality, I cannot agree more.

With the police department firm in its stance at this time even on a compromise, it may take an act of the public to vote out Mayor Wade Harper and councilmembers Monica Wilson and Mary Rocha in 2016 to turn the scanner back on.

1. East Contra Costa Fire Protection District Receive a Revenue Enhancement

Fire coverage in East County should be a top priority to every resident served by the East Contra Costa Fire Protection District A District once 8-stations strong now stands at 3-stations. In 2016, the District will likely seek a revenue enhancement for the third time while also preparing to allow the public to decide if it would like an elected fire board or not.

In a perfect scenario, the fire board becomes a 5-person elected board and enough revenue can be generated to ensure a minimum of six-stations (seven would be preferred).

ECCFPDFlyer3More importantly, I would like to at the very least see an honest and respectful debate over fire service. For far to long, lies and drive-bye statements have been made and the public has run with it due to anti-union statements.

With regards to salary and benefits, it would behoove the public to realize that according to the latest salary survey provided to me on December 30, the East Contra Costa Firefighters on average (benefits included) are paid 28 % less than neighboring districts.

The survey included 14-Districts which included Tracy and Manteca and ECCFPD firefighters still received less pay.

I would like to remind the public that should the fire district implode, both Brentwood and Oakley are required to provide fire service. For Brentwood, its estimated at a cost between $15 million which equates to an automatic tax of $500 per household and you still do not have five-engines responding.

People do not have to agree with a tax and are entitled to vote no, but the debate over fire service should be transparent on the “yes” side and the “no” side and lets address all issues and concerns like adults, not with drive-by accusations.

Honorable Mentions

  • City of Oakley & City of Pittsburg move to four-year term mayors.
  • Antioch actually decide to “Save the Yard” in its downtown area
  • Brentwood and Oakley work together to create a wine trail to promote tourism.
  • Increase pay to City Council positions–the return here is better candidates will seek office.
  • Sheriffs Office increase its Marine Patrol Unit to full-time year round
  • Antioch develop a Housing Authority
  • Oakley create a community center

By Michael Burkholder
Publisher of ECT

To contact the publisher, email [email protected]

You may also like

9 comments

Jim Simmons 42 Dec 31, 2015 - 9:03 am

Not a bad list. But your honorable mention of more council pay is off the mark. They are already paid enough for part-time work. I love the idea of Antioch hiring a PIO, I never thought of it like that. Antiochs problems start due to poor communication. That could benefit everyone.

Marty Fernandez Dec 31, 2015 - 9:05 am

I agree with all your points except Antioch starting a housing authority. This has been tried once and as someone who was involved I can assure you this would be a big mistake. The ramifications are far worse than what we have now. What we need is for the current county housing authority to ENFORCE THEIR OWN RULES which they currently do not. A good percentage of current enrollees would be outta here. Three homes on my own street are a good example.

Rivertown Resident Dec 31, 2015 - 9:15 am

Agree 100000000% they should provide the scanner online. I like the idea of putting it on a delay with their response times. That seems fair.

Fix Oakley Now Dec 31, 2015 - 9:29 am

Spot on, Oakley needs to fire Montgomery. They should have done it after he was provided a mortgage deal. Oakley has been going in the wrong direction for years and we do not have the infrastructure in place from roads to police and fire service to sustain levels of service when all these new homes come in. Oakley is failing us. Montgomery MUST go.

Burkhodler, this is the first good thing yo have said in some time.

Julio Dec 31, 2015 - 11:45 am

Montgomery is the answer? What have you been smoking? He has ruined Oakley.

Jennifer Dec 31, 2015 - 11:51 am

I agree with the civil approach towards social media. We all need to take responsibility for our own comments. I commend organizations who “weed out” instead of just being concerned about “traffic.” That’s a reflection on the organization.

Anon Too Dec 31, 2015 - 12:11 pm

I think I agree with most of your list but I couldn’t disagree more on the 4-year mayor…All you have to do is look at what Brentwood and Antioch have for Mayors.

John Dec 31, 2015 - 5:16 pm

Couldn’t agree more on your number 1 choice. No one wants to take on changes to Prop 13 for a permanent solution. We are going to need to. It’s the only “long-term” solution.

Think this through!!!!! Dec 31, 2015 - 11:03 pm

I agree John the number 1 choice shoulde be a high priority!!!!!! But changing prop 13 is not the correct way to do it!!!!!!! Prop. 13 helps us all. Re allocation of taxes shoulde be # 1 part in solution to help ECCFPd. But, We need to be realistic and digest this s…. Sandwich with small bites? How about getting some of that $$ that has been going to BBID watered district for DB since 1994 for no service, or even possibility of service. 800k a year for years with no return for DB on that tax. That or any part of that returned $$’ will help ECCFPD!!!

How about all new construction paying the county avrage of 12-14% to the ECCFPD like the rest of the county gets from all property taxes now. Now all ECCFPD gets is 8% from all property tax.

How about with all the above and we get a small tax assessment until we can give it our all to get reallocation of current property taxes. So ECCFPD GETS ITS 12-14% like the rest of county.
IF THIS (SPECIAL TAX ASSESMENT FOR ECCFPD) was passed !!!!! Which I don’t like, but, once again a s…. Sandwhich that behooves us all to take small bites for the greater good. We can put a sun set clause or expiration date on the ASSESMENT.

What other things can we do to help? What else is out there!!!!! I believe we pay enough already!!!! I get it? But if you look at the facts, I promise you we need to have good rescue, EMS , emergency, flood, earthquake , terrorism , active shooter,’water rescue, auto extraction, trench rescue, confined space rescue, natural gas explosions, I.e. San Bruno, hazardous material response oh oh and fire fighting if need be!!!!! Think about it, please,please think about it. Who do we call in a emergency when no one else will or can respond. Regardless of the emergency!!!! Who has to figure the situation out with the safest and least cost to ( life, property, enviorment) to the community and its citizens!!!!

So,,,!!!! Once again, let me reiterate, we pay enough taxes!!!! We need to fix the allocation. That can take time!!! Time we don’t have!!!!! But, is a large part of the long term solution and a must!!!!!! , It should be a large part of it. Wait to you need the fire service. At your time of need you will pay what ever it takes. The community deserves a reasonable response!!!!Let’s work on long term and short term solutions. Make sure we do short term help (solutions)to get us there!!!!! We all need to digest this s…. Sandwich that we have inherited. For the good of all. It can be done. The answers are in front of us all. We just might not get everything we personally want!!! Maybe part of it.

Please respond back with solutions that makes this a win/win for all involved. Not just anger!!!! Step up and help us fix this. The answers are there. We need to get them out and help us all!!!!

Comments are closed.