Home Antioch After Attack, Antioch Police Forced to Shoot Aggressive Dog

After Attack, Antioch Police Forced to Shoot Aggressive Dog

by ECT

Antioch PD 1

At 8:48 pm Wednesday night, the Antioch Police Department was forced to shoot at two aggressive dogs on Larkspur Drive to prevent it from furthering attacking Antioch residents. Police killed one of the dogs while scaring off the second. The second dog was later captured by Animal Control Officers.

In total, four victims sustained multiple dog bits and were treated at a local hospital for non-life threatening injuries. The dogs will now be tested for rabies and the victims will be notified about the results of the testing.

While its believed the dogs are pit bulls, Antioch PD has not yet confirmed the dogs breed according to the Press Release.

Here is the official Press Release from Antioch PD

FILE: 13-10077

INCIDENT: Dog Bite

DATE OF INCIDENT: 10/30/13

TIME OF INCIDENT: 2048

LOCATION: 2700 Block of Larkspur Drive

On 10/30/13 at approximately 2048 hours, an adult male was walking his two dogs on a walking trail near the 2700 block of Larkspur Drive. As he approached the street from the walking trail, both he and his two dogs were bitten by two loose dogs.

During the incident, three neighbors exited their homes to inquire as to the noise and they too were bitten by the loose dogs. Antioch Police Officers quickly responded to the scene and found both dogs still in the area. The dogs charged at the Officers and the Officers were forced to discharge their weapons, killing one of the dogs and scaring off the second.

All four injured adults were either treated at the scene or at local area hospitals for their non life threatening injuries.

The second aggressive dog later returned to the scene and was captured by Animal Control Officers without incident.

The breed of the loose dogs has not yet been confirmed nor has any owner been identified.

This preliminary information is made available by the Field Services Bureau. Further inquiries into the status of this case should be done via the Media Access Telephone Line (925) 779-6874. If you have information regarding this case you may text a tip to 274637 (CRIMES) using the key word ANTIOCH.

You may also like

19 comments

Buy a Clue Oct 31, 2013 - 8:05 am

Oh boy. New train wreck of posts coming in 3, 2…….

LLAB Oct 31, 2013 - 9:55 am

You are so right! Didn’t even post the breed and the guy below took pages of postings ;(

Thomas McCartney Oct 31, 2013 - 8:47 am

In a discussion of the Denver ban, Assistant City Attorney Kory Nelson recently told the San Francisco Chronicle that:

“Since 1989, when that city instituted a pit bull ban, ‘we haven’t had one serious pit bull attack,’ said Kory Nelson, a Denver assistant city attorney. His city’s assertion that ‘pit bulls are more dangerous than other breeds of dog’ has withstood legal challenges, he said.

‘We were able to prove there’s a difference between pit bulls and other breeds of dogs that make pit bulls more dangerous,’ he said.”

Sources: Denver Post
***************************************************
Toronto:

In a November 2011, public health statistics published by Global Toronto showed that pit bull bites dropped dramatically after Ontario adopted the Dog Owners Liability Act in 2005, an act that banned pit bulls:

The number of dog bites reported in Toronto has fallen since a ban on pit bulls took effect in 2005, public health statistics show.

A total of 486 bites were recorded in 2005. That number fell generally in the six years following, to 379 in 2010.

Provincial laws that banned ‘pit bulls,’ defined as pit bulls, Staffordshire terriers, American Staffordshire terriers, American pit bull terriers and dogs resembling them took effect in August 2005. Existing dogs were required to be sterilized, and leashed and muzzled in public.

Bites in Toronto blamed on the four affected breeds fell sharply, from 71 in 2005 to only six in 2010. This accounts for most of the reduction in total bites.
***************************************************

Salina, KS

Rose Base, director of the Salina Animal Shelter who lobbied for the ordinance, told the Salina Journal:

The ordinance has made a difference, she said. Records at the Salina Animal Shelter indicate there were 24 reported pit bull bites in 2003 and 2004, and only five since — none from 2009 to present.

Salina has 62 registered pit bulls, Base said. Before the ordinance she guessed there were “close to 300.” Since the first of this year three of the registered pit bulls have died of old age.

“We definitely haven’t had the severity of bites that we had in the past,” Base said. “Our community has been somewhat safer because of the law that was passed
***************************************************
Prince George’s County, MD
Prince George’s County passed a pit bull ban in 1996. In August 2009, Rodney Taylor, associate director of the county’s Animal Management Group, said that the number of pit bull biting incidents has fallen:

“Taylor said that during the first five to seven years of the ban, animal control officials would encounter an average of 1,200 pit bulls a year but that in recent years that figure has dropped by about half. According to county statistics, 36 pit bull bites, out of 619 total dog bites, were recorded in 2008, down from 95 pit bull bites, out of a total of 853, in 1996.”
***************************************************
Salina KS (a second article)

Note that they admit that the pit bull ban did not reduce the number of bites, but it did reduce the severity of bites reported by all breeds. Proof that when pit bull deniers find a jurisdiction that banned pit bulls, but reported no decrease in overall bites, is a moot point. Its death and dismemberment we are focusing on, not bite counts.

In the monthly city newsletter, In Touch, published in September 2006, the City of Salina reported that the pit bull ban adopted in 2005 significantly reduced pit bull biting incidents in just a 12 month period.

The number of pit bull bites depicted in the “Salina Pit Bull Bites Reported” graph shows 2002 with 13 pit bull bites, 2003 with 11 pit bull bites, 2004 with 15 pit bull bites and 2005 with only one bite. The newsletter notes that “animal bites reported have remained constant, but the severity of bites have decreased dramatically” since the enactment of the pit bull ban.
***************************************************
Springfield, MO

In April 2008, the Springfield-Greene County Health Department released data to a local TV station – following the City of Springfield’s adoption of a 2006 pit bull ban:

“The Springfield-Greene County Health Department reports that dog bites and vicious dog complaints are declining since the implementation of the Pit Bull Ordinance in the City of Springfield two years ago. In 2005 the health department fielded 18 vicious dog complaints, but only eight in 2007. Bites were down from 102 in 2005 to 87 in 2007.”
***************************************************
Washington

In 2008, the City of Wapato passed an ordinance that bans new pit bulls, rottweilers and mastiffs. Nine months after its adoption, in March 2009, Wapato Police Chief Richard Sanchez reported successful results:

“Nine months into the ban and police calls about vicious dogs have been cut in half. The Wapato Police tell Action News they’ve gone from 18 reports in January, February and March of last year to seven so far in ’09. “Seven calls in three months… that’s nothing,” says Chief Richard Sanchez, Wapato Police Department.

Chief Sanchez credits local cooperation for the decline of dangerous dogs.”
***************************************************
Rhode Island

When the City of Woonsocket was debating a pit bull ordinance in June 2009, the animal control supervisor in Pawtucket, John Holmes, spoke about the enormous success of Pawtucket’s 2003 pit bull ban:

“Holmes says he predicted that it would take two years for Pawtucket to experience the full benefit of the law after it was passed, but the results were actually apparent in half the time.

“It’s working absolutely fantastic,” said Holmes. “We have not had a pit bull maiming in the city since December of 2004.”
***************************************************
Per section 8-55 of Denvers pit bull ban:

A pit bull, is defined as any dog that is an APBT, Am Staf Terrier, Staff Bull Terrier, or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of anyone (1) or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which substantially conform to the standards set by the AKC or UKC for any of the above breed.

Over the course of 22 years, the Denver ban has withstood numerous battles in state and federal courts. It has been used as a model for over 600 USA cities that legislate pit bulls, as well as US Navy, Air Force, Marine and Army bases ( so much for Sgt Stubby).

without it, we’d see just what we see in Miss E’s lame replies. Every pit owner would claim their land shark was anything but a pit bull.

Miami Dade county voted 66% to keep their pit bull ban, just as it is worded, last year.

LLAB Oct 31, 2013 - 9:58 am

Where in the article does it name breed?! Typical stereotype…

Thomas McCartney Oct 31, 2013 - 8:47 am

24 dead by dog attack so far in 2013.
Pit bull type dogs killed twenty-two of them. Fifteen of the twenty-two dead are children.
Stars indicate people killed by a ‘family’ pit bull – ones that had been raised and cherished as an indoor pet, ‘never showed aggression before’, and knew the victim.

Child fatalities by pit bull type dog (14):
Christian Gormanous – 4 yrs old
Isaiah Aguilar – 2 yrs old
Ryan Maxwell – 7 yrs old **
Dax Borchardt – 14 mos old **
Monica Laminack – 21 mos old **
Tyler Jett – 7 yrs old
Jordyn Arndt – 4 yrs old **
Beau Rutledge – 2 yrs old **
Ayden Evans- 5 yrs old **
Nephi Selu – 6 yrs old **
Arianna Jolee Merrbach – 5 yrs old
Daniel (surname as yet not revealed) – 2 yrs old (Gilbert, Arizona) **
Samuel Eli Zamudio – 2 yrs old**
Jordan Ryan– 5 yrs old (Baker city, Oregon)**

Adult fatalities by pit bull type (8):
Betty Todd – 65 yrs old **
Elsie Grace – 91 yrs old **
Claudia Gallardo – 38 yrs old
Pamela Devitt – 63 yrs old
Carlton Freeman – 80 yrs old
Linda Oliver – 63 yrs old
James Harding – 62 yrs old – chased into traffic by two attacking pit bulls
Juan Campos – 96 yrs old

(1 non-pit type killing) [Rachel Honabarger – 35 yrs old – mauled to death by her own GSD mix]
(1 husky-mix killing, unknown if the other half of the dog was pit bull) [Jordan Lee Reed – 5 yrs old]

Two of the pit bull type dogs were BULL mastiffs, ie 40% pit-fighting bulldog.

If 20 of 24 dead were killed by pit bull attack, that’s 83% dead by pit attack, 9% dead by ‘molosser’, 4% by some kind of GSD mix, 4% by a husky + possibly pit mix

If you count the pit-mix mastiffs as pit bull types, that’s 92% killed by attacking pit bull types. Pit types are only about 5% of the entire dog population.

The man who ran into traffic kept pit bulls himself. He knew perfectly well what the two stranger pit bulls that were chasing him would do if they caught him, so he preferred to risk a swift death by oncoming car.

Thomas McCartney Oct 31, 2013 - 8:48 am

Dog Attack Deaths and Maimings, U.S. & Canada, September 1982 to May.25, 2013.

By compiling U.S. and Canadian press accounts between 1982 and 2013, Merritt Clifton, editor of Animal People, shows the breeds most responsible for serious injury and death.

Study highlights

Pit bull type dogs make up only 6% of all dogs in the USA.

The combination of Pit Bulls, rottweilers, their close mixes and wolf hybrids and other Pit Bull Type Dogs:

84% of attacks that induce bodily harm.

75% of attacks to children.

87% of attack to adults.

72% of attacks that result in fatalities.

80% that result in maiming.

Thomas McCartney Oct 31, 2013 - 8:48 am

KEVIN COUTTS, Head Dog Ranger, Rotorua, New Zealand
There was concern among dog authorities about American pitbulls being allowed into New Zealand as they were dangerous, unpredictable animals, Mr Coutts said.

“A lot of people in this town get them because they are a staunch dog and they will fight. They are perceived as vicious … It’s frustrating they were ever allowed in the country … we can’t go back now though,” Mr Coutts said.

COUTTS’ comment on a pit car mauling
This sort of thing happens when people own this breed of dog and then don’t look after them.

VICTORIA STILWELL, celebrity dog trainer
Presas are not to be fooled with, they’re dangerous. You’ve got a fighting breed here. You’ve got a dog that was bred for fighting. You’ve got one of the most difficult breeds to handle.

CESAR MILAN, celebrity dog trainer
“Yeah, but this is a different breed…the power that comes behind bull dog, pit bull, presa canario, the fighting breed – They have an extra boost, they can go into a zone, they don’t feel the pain anymore. He is using the bulldog in him, which is way too powerful, so we have to ‘make him dog’ (I guess as in a “regular” dog) so we can actually create the limits.

So if you are trying to create submission in a fighting breed, it’s not going to happen. They would rather die than surrender.”. If you add pain, it only infuriates them..to them pain is that adrenaline rush, they are looking forward to that, they are addicted to it…

That’s why they are such great fighters.” Cesar goes on to say…”Especially with fighting breeds, you’re going to have these explosions over and over because there’s no limits in their brain.”

GARRETT RUSSO, dog trainer
I estimate Medical & Veterinary bills related to injuries caused by pit bulls in the Tompkins Square dog run in 2011, $140,000.00. Estimated Medical (human) & Veterinary (canine) bills from all other breeds and mixed breeds combined during the same period, $5,000.00. (Estimate gathered from reports to by owners to the dog park association.)

STEVE DUNO, dog trainer, pit bull owner
“The dogs that participated in these attacks weren’t Pekingese. You don’t have herds of Pekingese roaming the city attacking people. When someone says all breeds are created equal, well then they’re denying the definition of what a breed is. Breed serves a particular purpose.”

“I like them. They’re eager. They’re athletic. They’re aesthetically pleasing. But even if they’re bred perfectly, they can be problematic, particularly with other dogs.”

“When you combine the breed specific behaviors … with owners who either don’t give a rip, or with owners who (have) too much dog, you have a problem.”

JEAN DONALDSON, dog trainer
Most commonly, she sees dogs with aggression problems. While she’s a fierce opponent of “breed bans” like the proposed outlawing of pit bulls that San Francisco debated two years ago, she believes it’s undeniable that some breeds are predisposed to violence.

Many breeds that were bred as guardians or fighting dogs were carefully designed to not like strangers, she says. She thinks it’s disingenuous of breeders to further enhance this trait, and then expect owners to compensate with training.

ARLENE STERLING, Newaygo County, MI Chief Animal Control Officer
“It is genetically inbred in them to be aggressive. They can be very nice dogs, but they are very prey driven and they are extremely strong. It makes them high risk dogs and it makes them extremely dangerous.”

BOB KERRIDGE, New Zealand SPCA executive director
“That is the only real way to solve this problem – is to license owners and to give them the responsibility that goes with owning a dog. It would be extremely useful when you have a neighbour who is concerned about that dog next door. You can look at it and see they don’t have a license and take it away. That’s owner responsibility.”

“We led the charge to stop the importation of the pitbull because of the concerns they would be crossbred with other dogs… But there’s not a lot we can do about that because it’s happened. We wish someone had listened all those years ago.”

JIM CROSBY, pit bull hired gun
“Line breeding tends to concentrate recessive traits. The propensity for violent attacks by a dog would be a recessive trait.”

MELANIE PFEIFFER, veterinary assistant
Working in a veterinary hospital, you are exposed to all kinds of animal trauma. One of the more common ones is dog fights. I can honestly say that in three out of four cases, an American pit bull terrier is involved. Many times, we are able to save the life of the afflicted, but yesterday, we were not.

I propose that all owned American pit bull terriers be registered and all breeding be halted indefinitely. How many mutilated faces, mangled limbs, butchered pets and even human deaths does it take to convince us that this breed needs to be phased out?

DIANE JESSUP, Washington pit bull owner and expert
“It’s not sensible to get an animal bred for bringing a 2,000-pound bull to its knees and say I’m going to treat this like a soft-mouth Labrador,” says Jessup, the former animal-control officer. She blames novice owners, as much as actual criminals, for bringing the breed into disrepute. “It’s a capable animal, and it’s got to be treated as such.”

JOHN ROCKHOLT, South Carolina dogman
“It’s inhumane not to allow them to fight. If you have to encourage them to fight they are not worth the powder it would take to blow them away. To never allow them any kind of combat…That’s inhumane.”

RAY BROWN, former pit bull owner, breeder, dog fighter
Pit bulls didn’t become dangerous because we fight them; we fight them because the English specifically bred them to be dangerous.

MARK PAULHUS, HSUS southeast regional coordinator
If it chooses to attack, it’s the most ferocious of all dogs. I’ve never known of a pit bull that could be called off (during a fight). They lose themselves in the fight.

F.L. DANTZLER, HSUS director of field services
“They’re borderline dogs. They’re right on the edge all of the time. Even if the dogs are not trained or used for fighting, and even though they are generally good with people, their bloodline makes them prone to violence.”

JimSimmons42 Oct 31, 2013 - 10:50 am

people really need to control their dogs. This was completely a preventable incident.

jerry collins Oct 31, 2013 - 9:37 pm

yes if its trained properly but the problem here in antioch is that responsible dog owners dont have pitbulls here,they have tamer breeds,its the wanna be 13-25 yr old gangsters that mostly have these dogs here,they have no ability to take them to a vet,house them other than a chain around the neck tied to a stake in the yard,usualy the mentality of the individual is instilled intot he dog, the scenarios go on and on,these people have no clue the responsibility it takes to raise that type of dog,the only thing that the gangster knows is hey man its a bluenose or a red nose i gots to get me one. i have 3 dogs various sizes and they are a huge responsibility.

Rose Feb 17, 2014 - 5:52 am

I’m a responsible dog owner, in fact my dog is a service dog. He also falls under the bully breed category. Many other breeds do that people aren’t aware of, such as boxers, Boston terriers, etc. I’m also not a 13-25 yr. old gangster… Having said that, I believe if a dog attacks and injures a human, they should be put down. Dogs shouldn’t be roaming loose either.

It’s sad that people like Thomas McCarthy (who is believed to actually be a woman who lives in Canada) have such a huge vendetta against bully breeds. They have a Facebook page where they post the most vile things about animals. Recently, a firefighter who posted to that page, a Richard Prince, did so in such a gory, heinous manner, about how to kill pit bulls. including using chain saws, screwdrivers in the eye, etc. was demoted from his job due to posting.

austin Oct 31, 2013 - 12:09 pm

I dont understand how hard it is for people to understand that it is mot the breeds fault for the type of owners they receive. Just because theres a pattern of people that own pit bulls that dont raise or properly take care of them doesnt mean you can ignorantly blaim the breed and not the owners. If youve ever owned a pit you know it’s one of the best loyal, caring, loving family dog breeds there are, as long as they are raised properly and taken care of. Any breed has the potential to be aggressive, its all on the owner not the breed!

Ceasar the dog whisperer Oct 31, 2013 - 3:22 pm

…Until it bites your face off.

Alma Smith Nov 1, 2013 - 2:11 am

Didn’t state the breed. Pump your brakes people. You’re trying to go faster than traffic.

Ceasar the dog whisperer Nov 1, 2013 - 9:08 am

“While its believed the dogs are pit bulls…” Looks to me like we can rule out the chihuahuas, poodles and dachshunds!

Maybe the Dingo ate your baby?

LLAB Nov 1, 2013 - 12:34 pm

Typical for you type of people…maybe they should muzzle you!

LLAB Nov 1, 2013 - 12:32 pm

Amen to that! I’ve had 3 in my life and would really never consider another breed. My dogs have always been amazing dogs around people, kids and cats 🙂 It’s called being responsible!

Dogloverhater Nov 1, 2013 - 1:42 pm

If I see a dog harm human being it is a simple decision to kill it as soon as possible.

Ride Along Highlights Need for Additional Antioch Police Officers | East County Today Nov 3, 2013 - 8:31 am

[…] should also be noted that later in the evening, there was a pitbull who was shot and killed by officers after an attack on four […]

Aggressive Dog: Children and Their Pets LIFESTYLE COOL TIPS Nov 9, 2013 - 10:57 am

[…] After Attack Antioch Police Forced to Shoot Aggressive Dog East At 8 48 pm the Antioch Police Department was forced to shoot at two aggressive dogs on Larkspur Drive to prevent it from furthering attacking Antioch residents.… […]

Comments are closed.