Home Antioch Antioch City Council to Discuss Hiring Contractor to Trap Wild Roosters and Hens

Antioch City Council to Discuss Hiring Contractor to Trap Wild Roosters and Hens

by ECT

On Tuesday, the Antioch City Council will discuss the idea of hiring a contractor at $7,050 to go out and capture wild roosters and hens in the north eastern part of the city.

According to the Staff Report, the wild rooster and hen problem is occurring in the area of Vine Lane, Viera Avenue, Walnut Avenue and Brown Lane. The caveat in the proposal is should the contractors efforts fail, costs could grow while the population of roosters and hens will simply repopulate.

It’s estimated that there are as many as 70 wild roosters and hens roaming the neighborhood with the original complaint dates back to December 2009 when a property owner complained to the County.

At the time, the result was:

“… It was apparent none of the involved parties were committed to assisting in trapping the birds. They all state they want the birds gone, but no one appears to want to do the work to make it happen…

According to a April 2, 2014 meeting with residents, folks in the area wanted them eradicated, but no one wanted to accept any cost for the animals trapped and removed. Some were agreeable to placing traps in their yards but refused to maintain or protect them.

Per the Staff Report:

On April 24, 2014, staff went out to a residence in the area to speak to the alleged owner/caretaker of the roosters and hens. Per this resident, she did not own any of the birds in the area. She claimed to feed feral cats that would come into her yard, but that was all. She stated she had no problem if the birds were taken away but said neither she nor any of her family members would do (or pay) anything to have them removed

From that time until July 22, 2014 there had been meetings and numerous phone calls between staff and the primary complaining resident. These conversations were unproductive.

According to the Staff Report

On August 12, 2014, staff went back out to the area of Vine Lane, Viera Avenue, Walnut Avenue and Bown Lane to talk to the neighbors concerning the roosters and hens. That day, staff reached out to nearly 20 area residents to talk to them about this issue. After the daylong visit, staff concluded the majority of the roosters and hens were staying toward the end of Walnut Avenue and Vine Lane. Staff further concluded the residents that lived in that area were likely contributing to the animals staying and reproducing, though staff had no way to prove it.

Both of these residents disassociated themselves from the animals and further refused to do anything about them. This response was consistent with other area residents, all of whom rejected ownership of the roosters and hens but refused to take any action of their own to eradicate them on their own property.

On August 26, staff sent a letter to all of the homes in that area as a final notice to any potential owners/caretakers of the roosters and hens. Staff received no responses.

City Staff says that they had a meeting in late 2014 with the resident who kept issuing the complaint. They say:

During that meeting, the resident was unwilling to take any responsibility for mitigating his issue. Although staff had done some research for him regarding a service to help eradicate the birds, he said it was not his responsibility. The quote from “Animal Damage Control” was $7,050 (Exhibit 2) for the initial sweep. (This quote was recently confirmed with “Animal Damage Control” and remains the same.) When this was proposed to the resident, he said this was not his problem and expected the City of Antioch to eradicate the birds. This resident would not accept these were wild animals and that City Staff does not address non-vicious wild animals. Since that meeting, this resident has contacted individual Council Members and made appearances at City Council meetings.

City Staff are looking for direction from the City Council after they have exhausted all efforts with the residents in the area and no one is willing to participate in resolving the problem and instead expecting the City to resolve it.

Currently, Antioch Animal Control Services (like the County) does not address wild (feral) animals that are non-vicious. They do not address complaints about crows, pheasants, owls, woodpeckers, pigeons, rodents, etc. Staff is suggesting they continue this practice and mimic the county.

One solution, shooting or killing the birds, will reflect negatively on Animal Services in killing non-violent wild animals.

Staff also says that if the Council approves the contract to trap these birds, it sets a precedent and it will be hard to say “no” to the next person who files a complaint.

Staff further highlighted that the initial estimate of $7,050was just the start and believe it will be much higher because some residents feed these wild animals and will not allow the city or city contractor onto their property to trap–ultimately, most residents are not willing to get involved.

Ultimately, unless the contract is able to trap all estimated 70 birds, they will simply reproduce and the problem will continue.

Staff also pointed out that unlike Feral Cat Advocates, these residents are not willing to work with staff and help resolve this issue. They were not willing to work with CCCAC and apparently have continued with the same attitude with Antioch Animal Shelter staff.

If You Go:
Antioch City Council Meeting
Tuesday, January 26, 2016 at 7:00 pm
City Council Chambers, 200 H Street, Antioch

You may also like

12 comments

Jerry Jan 26, 2016 - 7:08 am

Just shoot the damn things and feed the homeless. I am sure they can use the protein. We have a lot of hunters in Antioch and you can pay us $7k instead.

Anna James Jan 26, 2016 - 7:17 am

Way to focus on higher priority issues Antioch. You are making a great case to all be replaced in the upcoming election. At some point, you just have to put your foot down and put responsibility on the residents. This is why Antioch needs more code enforcement officers, start issuing fines to this neighborhood so they shape up really quickly.

Jim Simmons Jan 26, 2016 - 7:23 am

This makes no sense, they are going after chickens harder than they are criminals. Shows you where this councils priorities are. What a freaking joke!

Julio Jan 26, 2016 - 9:20 am

They didn’t even go after the cats like this and they should have. They have no priorities. Just elections. They should make the man making all the complaints pay for the removal. No one else is complaining.

Donna Salazar Jan 26, 2016 - 9:49 am

Is it April 1st already?? This can’t be really what our “Elected” officials are going to talk about tonight. Oh I get it this is all they can talk about in front of us. Either that or they will waste all the time tonight so no one will be able to discuss the real issue tonight. THE YARD AND THE SAVING OF IT.

G Jan 26, 2016 - 10:23 am

Heck I’ll do the job free as long as I can fry or BBQ each chicken I bag! LOL

Anon Too Jan 26, 2016 - 11:36 am

Mongooses could solve this problem for the cost of a few Mongeese (Mongooses? Mongoosii?)

..r..j.b.. Jan 26, 2016 - 6:13 pm

And this is another small issue the council will tout as a great achievement. Just look at the picture of those clowns when Antioch opened a new Taco Bell. Winning! Right mayor?

Rachel Jan 26, 2016 - 7:46 pm

Here’s something you all don’t know but I do because I used to live on that street when this all started. A neighborhood lady brought 3 or 4 of them roosters to her yard & let them roam free…..to reproduce. When other residents started complaining they were in their yards, she denied they were ever hers. One of them even chased after my 2-yr old nephew, violently, and could have really hurt him. Now there’s 70 of them damn things roaming around & you all expect the whole neighborhood should ‘take care of them’ and at their own expenses? Would you??!

.r.j..b. Jan 26, 2016 - 9:10 pm

Sounds like the City should hold her responsible for the cost of trapping and removing the roosters.

Unome Jan 27, 2016 - 1:56 pm

Just put an ad in the paper ” Free Live Chickens ” You catch and keep. There I just saved the city seven thousand dollars and feed some people. On top of that, they are ” Free Range Chickens ” healthier for everyone. I should be Mayor. In all seriousness have people trap them like cats and call animal control to pick them up. You don’t need to hire a contractor. How dumb when you have animal control people who are salaried. Geesh.

Bret Loomis Jan 30, 2016 - 2:37 pm

One Million Dollars was set aside to cover issues in this annexed area. This issue was left over from county control. Therefore, it is a city problem with desiganated funds.

@Unome- The city would not call the guy who deals with this issue cheaply…and he does eat them. Why? Because he might not have a license. GIVE HIM A TEMP. LICENSE!

@ East County Today- The fact that this issue has to be on the agenda is a sign that the City Manager is lacking. On a case by case basis, the city can choose to act! So, you should be looking for the bottle neck!. Let me clue you in, The Police Chief is angry with one of the most vocal residents. He was even heard telling that resident “i am going to bury you”. So, is it going to cost the city $ 15K by the time they get around to acting?

@City of Antioch City Manager- Take charge! Resolve this problem, check into alternative options, give out temporary permits or licenses to get it done. Work out a maintenance plan that includes the residents. WELCOME THEM to the city with a gracious act.

If that property owner and city fail in resolving the issue, they will likely face a civil law suit. If they are in her trees, it IS her problem. If the city has stated that they will hire a contractor to resolve this (see KPIX report), then continues to delay, they are exposed.

@City Counsil- You should be angered at the police chief and city manager that an annexed area ongoing issue has made it onto your agenda. It is not a normal circumstance and has designated mitigation funding, therefore can be argued that it does not set a precedence.

ANTIOCH. It once was the jewel of East County.

Comments are closed.