ALADS: Being Murdered Should Not Be Dismissed as “Part of the Risk” for a Law Enforcement Officer

2

The following statement was issued by the Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs 

The murder of a law enforcement officer has been one of the “special circumstance” categories that makes a defendant eligible for the death penalty ever since capital punishment was reinstated in California in the 1970s. It recognizes that those who were murdered in the line of duty are murdered because they represent society, and the murderous attack is an attack on society. With the recent sentencing of an unrepentant killer who took the lives of two Sacramento-area deputies, there are now 44 individuals on California’s death row for the murder of a deputy sheriff or police officer.

Thus, it was with shock and revulsion that we read the remarks of a candidate for District Attorney in Contra Costa County. Lawrence Strauss, a candidate for District Attorney announced that if elected, he would not seek the death penalty for defendants who killed a police officer because “it’s part of the risk they take.” He later qualified the statement to say that he would not seek the death penalty for those who kill only one officer — as if his “risk they take” argument disappears if multiple officers were killed.

ALADS supports Contra Costa County Deputy Sheriffs’ Association President Sgt. Shawn Welch’s stance and statement. Sgt. Welch called the comments “archaic” and “extremely inappropriate.” Sgt. Welch spoke for the law enforcement community when he added, “Law enforcement officers are hired to ensure the public’s safety and enforce the constitution and laws of the state. We are not pawns for a brutal dictator. Strauss’ performance last night should have made it clear to anyone voting in the primary election that he should not even be on the ballot for district attorney.”

In an eloquent column recently published following the murder of a Dallas police officer, columnist Jacquielynn Floyd observed , “Yes, there are lot of police officers in this country, and theirs is a risky job. It’s too easy to forget that they assume this risk on our behalf — until it costs a life.” She then went on to write: “But the murder of a police officer — like the murder of a child — still leaves us shaken, destabilized. There’s a reason both of these are capital crimes in the state of Texas. In the case of children, we’re heartbroken by their innocence. When it’s cops, we’re unsettled because we’re temporarily reminded of their willingness to accept risks that most of us would not.”

A person who fails to understand the sentiments expressed by Ms. Floyd, and instead dismisses a peace officer’s murder as a “risk they take,” should never be elected District Attorney.

The Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs (ALADS) is the collective bargaining agent representing more than 7,900 deputy sheriffs and district attorney investigators working in Los Angeles County.

Like our Facebook page www.facebook.com/aladsonline

SHARE

2 COMMENTS

  1. Police work isn’t even in the top 10 dangerous jobs. Bunch of hypocrites, when they’re trigger happy and kill a civilian or jump them like a bunch of gangsters in uniform, it’s always business as usual and no one is held accountable. Where’s our parade and commemoration? Why when civilans like teachers, doctors, nurses, lawyers, etc, get murdered aren’t the attackers automatically on death row? Are their efforts for society worth less? Some drug charges are held with heavier sentences than murder. Our justice system is a sham sometimes, this proves that police are above it even more.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here